Back to Blog
high severity August 18, 2026 · 4 min read Unverified claim — what this is

ssf-int.com ssf-ing.de Listed by Inc Ransom Ransomware Group

If you have an account with ssf-int.com ssf-ing.de, here’s what is being claimed, and what it would mean for you.

ssf-int.com ssf-ing.de was listed on the Inc Ransom ransomware leak site. The group claims to have stolen internal data.

— from INC Ransom’s own leak-site posting. This is the group’s claim, quoted verbatim; it is not GalaxyWarden’s reporting and has not been independently verified.
ssf-int.com  ssf-ing.de Listed by Inc Ransom Ransomware Group

If you had an account on ssf-int.com or ssf-ing.de, the Inc Ransom ransomware group has listed the company on its leak site. The group claims it obtained files containing customer and employee information, including at least one password field. As of this writing, neither company has publicly confirmed that any breach occurred or that any data was taken.

Already exposed?
You can’t unleak a breach. You can take away what it’s worth.
Deep Sweep shows you every leak tied to you and exactly what to change. Then it strips your name, address and family off the look-up sites that turn a leaked record into somebody knocking on your door — $29 one-time, includes 30 days of Protection. We write to 582 companies. No subscription to start.
Scan free, then Deep Sweep — $29 →
Not ready yet? Run a free breach check on this email
We’ll check it against 13.1B+ leaked records right now — no account needed. Continuous monitoring & alerts are part of Protection.

This means the only thing you can treat as certain today is that your email address linked to those domains is now publicly associated with an active extortion attempt. Everything beyond that — whether files were actually stolen, what they contained, and whether any of it is usable — remains unverified. That uncertainty itself is part of what you must manage right now.

What the Listing Claims Was Taken and What That Would Enable

According to the Inc Ransom listing, the material includes customer records and at least one password field. The storage scheme for that password field has not been disclosed. This is important: without knowing whether the passwords were stored using strong, slow hashing or something weaker, you cannot assume they are safe or assume they are immediately cracked. The only responsible position is to treat your ssf password as potentially compromised and act accordingly.

If the claim is accurate and the data was taken, attackers would gain the ability to test your reused password on other services. That is the primary near-term risk for most readers. No permanent government or biographic identifiers such as Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers, or passport details are listed in the claim, which removes several of the more lasting identity-theft pathways that appear in other incidents.

Because the company has not confirmed the incident, it is also possible the listing contains no new data at all. Some ransomware groups republish older stolen datasets or simply name companies they never successfully compromised in hopes of pressuring them into payment. You must therefore prepare for the worst while recognizing the claim may be inflated or false.

How Much Should You Believe a Ransomware Leak-Site Listing

Ransomware groups maintain leak sites as a core part of their business model. After encrypting a victim’s systems they often threaten to publish stolen data unless a ransom is paid. When payment is not made, they post a listing. These postings are marketing as much as disclosure: the group has every incentive to exaggerate the volume, sensitivity, and recency of the material.

Independent confirmation is rare. Most listings never receive verification from the affected company, a regulator, or a trusted third-party breach index. Some turn out to be recycled data from earlier unrelated breaches. Others contain only low-value or already-public information. A small number are later proven genuine when the company issues a formal notice or regulators become involved.

In this case, the incident remains in the unconfirmed category. Have I Been Pwned carries the listing because the group published it, not because the data itself has been analyzed and validated. Real confirmation would require the company to acknowledge the breach, describe the scope, and notify affected individuals directly. Until that happens, the safest approach is cautious preparation rather than panic or dismissal.

The Current Pattern in Ransomware Extortion

Publishing unverified listings has become standard operating procedure for many ransomware crews. It shifts the cost of uncertainty onto the victim company and its customers. Even when the claim later proves overstated, the initial wave of worry, customer inquiries, and potential regulatory attention creates pressure.

For you as a customer, this pattern means you will likely encounter similar situations again. Email addresses tied to accounts you no longer actively use frequently surface in these listings years after the original compromise. The password advice you follow today therefore has value beyond this single incident: changing important passwords and stopping reuse protects you against both confirmed and unconfirmed claims that may appear in the future.

What the Lack of Confirmation Changes for You

Because nothing has been independently verified, you cannot rely on the company to send you a breach notification with precise details. That places the monitoring burden on you. You also cannot know whether any account takeover attempts have already occurred using credentials taken from this listing. The absence of confirmation does not mean the risk is zero; it means the timetable is unknown.

The fact that no permanent identifiers were listed is genuinely good news. Your name-and-date-of-birth combination, which can be used to build long-term fraud profiles, does not appear to be part of this claim. That narrows the risk window to credentials and any non-permanent customer records that might have been included.

Actions You Should Take Now

  1. Change your password on ssf-int.com and ssf-ing.de immediately if you still have an active account there. Use a unique, strong password you have never used anywhere else. This is the single most effective step while the storage method remains unknown.
  2. Check every other account where you used the same password and change those too. If the claimed password field was stored insecurely, attackers may already be testing it across popular services. Prioritize email, banking, and any site that holds payment methods.
  3. Enable two-factor authentication everywhere it is offered, preferring app-based or hardware keys over SMS. This blocks most credential-stuffing attacks even if your password has already been obtained.
  4. Review recent account activity on any service tied to the same email address you used at ssf. Look for unfamiliar logins, password reset requests you did not make, or changes to contact details.
  5. Monitor your email for any future communication from the company about this listing. If they later confirm details, you may need to take additional steps specific to what they disclose.

GalaxyWarden provides continuous monitoring across 13.1B+ breach records and 100+ platforms with identity-chain mapping and remediation support by specialists. One sentence of preparation today can prevent weeks of cleanup later.

What the free scan actually returns

Sample resultyou@email.comIllustrative — not a real person

Found on people-search siteswe remove these

These listings are live, public, and legal to remove. That’s what a Deep Sweep buys.

value redacted in this sampleage, relatives, address historySpokeo
value redacted in this samplephone, household, property recordsBeenVerified
value redacted in this sample582 companies checked

Found in breach recordsverifiedreported — unverified

Each record is labeled: confirmed breach data, or an attacker’s claim no one has verified.

verifiedvalue redacted in this samplepassword + phone · 2024telecom breach
unverifiedvalue redacted in this sampleclaimed in ransomware listing · 2026leak-site claim

Leaked data cannot be deleted from the internet — anyone claiming otherwise is lying. Broker listings can be removed. We do the second, and show you exactly what to fix from the first.

Check your exposure
ssf-int.com ssf-ing.de is one breach. Your email is probably in others.
We can’t confirm any single incident against the sources we search, so we won’t pretend to. What we can show you is your own exposure — your email against 13.1B+ leaked records and the sites that publish your address. About 15 seconds. No account, no card.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

Report details & sourcing

Severity High
Disclosed August 18, 2026
Affected Unconfirmed
Unverified claim — what this report is
This page documents a public listing on a ransomware/extortion group’s leak site, tracked via public threat-intelligence sources. A listing is the attacker’s claim. GalaxyWarden aggregates and reports such claims; we have not independently verified that a breach occurred, what data (if any) was taken, or the accuracy of anything the group asserts, and the named organisation has not necessarily confirmed the incident. Sections above describe what the listing shows and the group’s documented history — not verified findings about the named organisation. If you represent this organisation and believe anything here is inaccurate, tell us and we’ll review it promptly.
Editorial & sourcing policy
GalaxyWarden is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data. Breach information is compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms, and is reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — see our content & takedown policy or write to support@galaxywarden.com.
Share this Post on X Reddit Email