Skip to content
Back to Blog
high severity September 22, 2026 · 4 min read Unverified claim — what this is

PSA Listed by ShinyHunters Ransomware Group

If you are a customer of PSA, here’s what is being claimed, and what it would mean for you.

Dear Assistant Director Brett Leatherman of the FBI Cyber Division & Director Kash Patel of the FBI, During Quarter Two of this year the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) made substantial false allegations regarding our organisation in a FLASH report. We have been severely offended. We were very disappointed to see an agency of your standing would resort to such circulation of disinformation in an attempt to "disrupt" our operations, an effort that ultimately proved unsuccessful. For us to properly address and correct these unfounded allegations, we were compelled to adopt a forceful and a

— from ShinyHunters’s own leak-site posting. This is the group’s claim, quoted verbatim; it is not GalaxyWarden’s reporting and has not been independently verified.
PSA Listed by ShinyHunters Ransomware Group

Your account credentials with PSA may now be public. According to the ShinyHunters leak site, the group has listed PSA on its extortion page and published what it claims is proof of access, including at least one exposed password field. The company has not publicly confirmed the claim as of this writing, and no independent verification has established that a breach occurred or that any data was taken.

Watch PSA

Get alerted the next time PSA files a breach with any US regulator — the filing, dated and sourced. A free single-company slice of Signals; no account needed.

We’ll email you only about PSA’s future breach filings and how to watch a whole vendor list — not general marketing. Unsubscribe any time.

Watching your whole vendor list (50 to 500 companies, by tier) is GalaxyWarden Signals.

This situation leaves you in a specific kind of uncertainty. If the claim is genuine and your password was among the material posted, anyone can now attempt to use it on other services where you reused the same credentials. The record does not disclose how the password was stored, so the safest assumption is that you should treat it as immediately usable by attackers.

A Password Field Was Listed, But the Storage Scheme Is Unknown

The ShinyHunters listing references a password field but provides no technical details about hashing or encryption. Without that information it is impossible to know whether the password was protected by strong, slow hashing that would resist cracking or stored in a form that could be used right away. Because the scheme is not disclosed, treat the credential as compromised and change it everywhere it has been reused.

Exposure Pack · one payment
The full list, and what to lock in ten minutes.
  • Every indexed leak tied to your address — all of them, named and dated
  • What this kind of incident typically exposes
  • A ten-minute lock list written for this kind of organisation
One payment. Nothing renews, and no account is created. Emailed to you within a minute.

No permanent government or biographic identifiers such as Social Security numbers or passport numbers appear in this particular claim. That removes some of the most lasting risks that accompany many other incidents. Your date of birth, address history, or financial account numbers were also not listed. The only concrete element that matters to you right now is the potential exposure of an account password.

What a Leak-Site Listing Actually Establishes

ShinyHunters, like several other ransomware and extortion groups, routinely posts companies on leak sites after making an initial demand. These listings are produced by the attacker and are designed to pressure the target into paying or to retaliate when the target cooperates with law enforcement. The posted material is chosen and described by the group itself.

Many such claims later prove to be recycled from earlier incidents, exaggerated, or simply false. Some groups have posted placeholder data or old dumps to maintain reputation when an actual compromise did not yield useful material. A listing on a leak site therefore establishes only that one crew says it has something. It does not constitute confirmation that PSA was breached, that customer data was allegedly stolen, or that the published sample is authentic.

Real confirmation would require an admission by PSA, a regulatory filing that describes the incident, or forensic evidence made public by a credible third party. None of those exist here. The September 22, 2026 filing date on the record is simply when the group chose to publish its accusation. The record gives no separate incident date and no discovery date, so any timeline beyond that single publication day remains unknown.

The Pattern These Groups Follow

Extortion crews have increasingly used public accusations against law enforcement statements as justification for their postings. In this case the group’s message directly addresses the FBI, claiming the agency circulated disinformation and that the leak is retaliation. This framing is common: it attempts to shift blame and portray the publication as somehow justified.

For you, the practical takeaway is that similar claims against other organisations will probably appear in the future. When you see a company you deal with listed on a leak site, the same rules apply: assume the credential is at risk until proven otherwise, change the password immediately, and do not wait for the company to confirm. The absence of confirmation does not mean the claim is false; it simply means the facts have not yet been established.

What You Should Do Immediately

  • Change your PSA password right now and do not reuse it anywhere else. Generate a unique, long password for that account.
  • Enable two-factor authentication on your PSA account if it is not already active. This blocks login even if the password is known.
  • Review every other account where you used the same password and change those as well. Prioritise email, banking, and any service that could lead to account takeover.
  • Watch for any direct communication from PSA. If the company later confirms an incident it will be required to notify affected customers individually.

GalaxyWarden provides continuous monitoring across 13.1B+ breach records and 100+ platforms, identity-chain mapping, and remediation support by specialists.

What the free scan actually returns

Sample resultyou@email.comIllustrative — not a real person

Found on people-search siteswe remove these

These listings are live, public, and legal to remove — and removing them is what we do.

value redacted in this sampleage, relatives, address historySpokeo
value redacted in this samplephone, household, property recordsBeenVerified
value redacted in this sample580 companies checked

Found in breach recordsverifiedreported — unverified

Each record is labeled: confirmed breach data, or an attacker’s claim no one has verified.

verifiedvalue redacted in this samplepassword + phone · 2024telecom breach
unverifiedvalue redacted in this sampleclaimed in ransomware listing · 2026leak-site claim

Leaked data cannot be deleted from the internet — anyone claiming otherwise is lying. Broker listings can be removed. We do the second, and show you exactly what to fix from the first.

Check your exposure
PSA is one listing. Your email is probably in others.
We can’t confirm any single incident against the sources we search, so we won’t pretend to. What we can show you is your own exposure — your email against 13.1B+ leaked records and the sites that publish your address. About 15 seconds. No account, no card.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

Report details & sourcing

Severity High the filing does not enumerate what was exposed
Disclosed September 22, 2026
Last reviewed September 22, 2026
Affected Unconfirmed
Unverified claim — what this report is
This page documents a public listing on a ransomware/extortion group’s leak site, tracked via public threat-intelligence sources. A listing is the attacker’s claim. GalaxyWarden aggregates and reports such claims; we have not independently verified that a breach occurred, what data (if any) was taken, or the accuracy of anything the group asserts, and the named organisation has not necessarily confirmed the incident. Sections above describe what the listing shows and the group’s documented history — not verified findings about the named organisation. If you represent this organisation and believe anything here is inaccurate, tell us and we’ll review it promptly.
Editorial & sourcing policy
GalaxyWarden is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data. Breach information is compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms, and is reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — see our content & takedown policy or write to support@galaxywarden.com.
Share this Post on X Reddit Email