Skip to content
Back to Blog
high severity September 22, 2026 · 3 min read Unverified claim — what this is

NAI Earle Furman Listed by Secp0 Ransomware Group

If you are a customer of NAI Earle Furman, here’s what is being claimed, and what it would mean for you.

The reviewed dataset is a single-snapshot, single-volume file-server tree (E:/Shares, 1.36M paths) covering NAI Earle Furman's brokerage deals, property-management portfolio (MRI accounting), broker commissions, employee home directories, and the absorbed Croxton Gray firm's data...

— from Secp0’s own leak-site posting. This is the group’s claim, quoted verbatim; it is not GalaxyWarden’s reporting and has not been independently verified.
NAI Earle Furman Listed by Secp0 Ransomware Group

NAI Earle Furman has been listed on the Secp0 ransomware leak site. The group claims it obtained a 1.36 million-path file-server snapshot from the real-estate firm’s network containing brokerage deals, property-management records, broker commissions, employee home directories, and data from the absorbed Croxton Gray firm. As of this writing, NAI Earle Furman has not publicly confirmed the claim.

Already exposed?
You can’t unleak data. You can take away what it’s worth.
A leaked record is where it starts, not where it ends. What turns it into your front door is the look-up sites publishing your address beside your name — and those are what an AI reads when somebody asks about you. The free scan shows you both. We write to 580 companies.
See what is exposed about you — free scan →

Watch NAI Earle Furman

Get alerted the next time NAI Earle Furman files a breach with any US regulator — the filing, dated and sourced. A free single-company slice of Signals; no account needed.

We’ll email you only about NAI Earle Furman’s future breach filings and how to watch a whole vendor list — not general marketing. Unsubscribe any time.

Watching your whole vendor list (50 to 500 companies, by tier) is GalaxyWarden Signals.

If the claim is accurate, the records now advertised on a dark-web leak site could contain sensitive business and personal documents that most people would prefer to keep private. What matters to you right now is understanding exactly what this listing does and does not prove, which parts of your information cannot be taken back, and which risks you can still control.

A Single File-Server Snapshot Is Not the Same as Every Record You Ever Had

The listing describes one point-in-time copy of folders on a drive labeled E:/Shares. It is not a customer database, not a master list of every client the firm has ever served, and not a dump of every system the company operates. The record gives no count of individuals whose information appears inside those folders. It also does not list specific categories such as Social Security numbers or financial account details for any one person. That absence is important: the attacker’s description is marketing, not an inventory.

Exposure Pack · one payment
The full list, and what to lock in ten minutes.
  • Every indexed leak tied to your address — all of them, named and dated
  • A deeper search of collected breach data — the kinds of your information it holds, where it finds you
  • What this kind of incident typically exposes
  • A ten-minute lock list written for this kind of organisation
One payment. Nothing renews, and no account is created. Emailed to you within a minute.

Your name paired with an address or commission statement can still be embarrassing or useful for impersonation attempts, but it does not create the same lifelong anchor that an exposed Social Security number does.

What a Ransomware Leak-Site Listing Actually Establishes

Ransomware groups frequently post victim names to pressure payment. The mere appearance of a company on such a site is an accusation, not proof. Sometimes the data is old, sometimes it is exaggerated, and sometimes the group never had access to the systems it claims. Without confirmation from the company, independent forensic analysis, or regulatory notification, the claim remains unverified.

That uncertainty cuts both ways. You should not dismiss the listing entirely, but you also should not treat it as settled fact. Real confirmation would come from direct notification by NAI Earle Furman stating that your specific records were involved. The filing itself provides no incident date, only the September 22, 2026 listing date, so there is no reliable timeline to measure against your own records.

Real-Estate and Property-Management Firms Are Frequent Targets

Brokerage files, MRI accounting data, commission spreadsheets, and absorbed-firm records are exactly the kind of information ransomware operators look for. They are often stored on accessible file servers rather than tightly segmented databases, and they tend to contain contracts, payment details, and personal information on clients, tenants, and employees. This pattern has repeated across dozens of similar firms in recent years. The practical takeaway is that if you have worked with any real-estate or property-management company in the last several years, you may face repeated exposure risks even if this particular claim proves overstated.

What You Should Do Now

  • Change any password you have used with NAI Earle Furman or related services. Do this first and do not reuse the old password anywhere.
  • Review recent statements and correspondence from the firm. Look for any notice about a security incident; absence of a letter usually indicates your records were not in the affected group, but contact them directly if you have changed addresses since 2026.
  • Place a fraud alert with the three major credit bureaus. This adds a layer of protection if any financial or identity documents from the file server are misused.
  • Monitor accounts that could be affected by leaked commission, brokerage, or property-management records. Watch for unusual activity on bank accounts, tax filings, or loan applications that might use information from those folders.
  • Consider ongoing monitoring that tracks both new leaks and identity-chain risks across more than 13.1 billion breach records. GalaxyWarden provides continuous monitoring across 13.1B+ breach records and 100+ platforms, identity-chain mapping, and remediation by specialists.

What the free scan actually returns

Sample resultyou@email.comIllustrative — not a real person

Found on people-search siteswe remove these

These listings are live, public, and legal to remove — and removing them is what we do.

value redacted in this sampleage, relatives, address historySpokeo
value redacted in this samplephone, household, property recordsBeenVerified
value redacted in this sample580 companies checked

Found in breach recordsverifiedreported — unverified

Each record is labeled: confirmed breach data, or an attacker’s claim no one has verified.

verifiedvalue redacted in this samplepassword + phone · 2024telecom breach
unverifiedvalue redacted in this sampleclaimed in ransomware listing · 2026leak-site claim

Leaked data cannot be deleted from the internet — anyone claiming otherwise is lying. Broker listings can be removed. We do the second, and show you exactly what to fix from the first.

Check your exposure
NAI Earle Furman is one listing. Your email is probably in others.
We can’t confirm any single incident against the sources we search, so we won’t pretend to. What we can show you is your own exposure — your email against 13.1B+ leaked records and the sites that publish your address. About 15 seconds. No account, no card.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

Report details & sourcing

Severity High the filing does not enumerate what was exposed
Disclosed September 22, 2026
Last reviewed September 22, 2026
Affected Unconfirmed
Unverified claim — what this report is
This page documents a public listing on a ransomware/extortion group’s leak site, tracked via public threat-intelligence sources. A listing is the attacker’s claim. GalaxyWarden aggregates and reports such claims; we have not independently verified that a breach occurred, what data (if any) was taken, or the accuracy of anything the group asserts, and the named organisation has not necessarily confirmed the incident. Sections above describe what the listing shows and the group’s documented history — not verified findings about the named organisation. If you represent this organisation and believe anything here is inaccurate, tell us and we’ll review it promptly.
Editorial & sourcing policy
GalaxyWarden is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data. Breach information is compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms, and is reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — see our content & takedown policy or write to support@galaxywarden.com.
Share this Post on X Reddit Email