Skip to content
Back to Blog
high severity September 23, 2026 · 2 min read Unverified claim — what this is

Cosef Listed by Booba Project Ransomware Group

If you are a customer of Cosef, here’s what is being claimed, and what it would mean for you.

Facilities Services Stolen data: 200 GB.

— from Booba Project’s own leak-site posting. This is the group’s claim, quoted verbatim; it is not GalaxyWarden’s reporting and has not been independently verified.
Cosef Listed by Booba Project Ransomware Group

The Booba Project has listed Cosef on its leak site, claiming that 200 GB of data belonging to the facilities services company was taken. According to the listing, the group is using the publication to pressure the organisation. Cosef has not publicly confirmed the claim as of writing.

Already exposed?
You can’t unleak data. You can take away what it’s worth.
A leaked record is where it starts, not where it ends. What turns it into your front door is the look-up sites publishing your address beside your name — and those are what an AI reads when somebody asks about you. The free scan shows you both. We write to 580 companies.
See what is exposed about you — free scan →

Watch Cosef

Get alerted the next time Cosef files a breach with any US regulator — the filing, dated and sourced. A free single-company slice of Signals; no account needed.

We’ll email you only about Cosef’s future breach filings and how to watch a whole vendor list — not general marketing. Unsubscribe any time.

Watching your whole vendor list (50 to 500 companies, by tier) is GalaxyWarden Signals.

What This Listing Actually Means for You

If you are a customer of Cosef, your records may be among those referenced. Because the filing does not enumerate any specific categories of information, it is not possible to know whether permanent identifiers, financial details, or other sensitive data were included. What matters is that any information you gave the company could now be in the hands of an extortion group. That risk remains conditional until and unless Cosef confirms the claim and tells you directly what was involved.

Exposure Pack · one payment
The full list, and what to lock in ten minutes.
  • Every indexed leak tied to your address — all of them, named and dated
  • A deeper search of collected breach data — the kinds of your information it holds, where it finds you
  • What this kind of incident typically exposes
  • A ten-minute lock list written for this kind of organisation
One payment. Nothing renews, and no account is created. Emailed to you within a minute.

The absence of a letter from Cosef usually indicates you were not in the affected group. However, because the record provides no incident date, there is no reliable way to judge how long ago this may have occurred. Anyone who has changed address since dealing with the company should contact them directly to confirm whether their records were part of the claimed set.

How Ransomware Leak-Site Claims Are Produced

Ransomware and extortion crews routinely post company names on leak sites after failing to receive payment. These listings are marketing material designed to create urgency. They frequently mix genuine intrusions with recycled data from older incidents, exaggerated volumes, or entirely false claims. A 200 GB figure, in particular, is impossible to verify from the listing alone and is a common tactic to make the claim appear more substantial.

No independent party — regulator, breach-notification service, or security researcher — has validated this specific listing. Until Cosef itself acknowledges the incident and provides details, the claim remains unproven. Real confirmation would come from the company issuing formal notifications to affected customers, not from the extortion group's website.

The Wider Pattern of Unverified Extortion Listings

This tactic has become standard industry behaviour among ransomware operators. Groups publish names to pressure victims while knowing many organisations will pay quietly to avoid publicity. The result is a steady stream of listings that later prove overstated, stale, or fabricated. For you, the practical takeaway is caution: treat every new leak-site appearance as a prompt to check directly with the organisation rather than accepting the group's word. It also means future similar claims against other companies you deal with should be viewed through the same sceptical lens until independently verified.

Protecting Yourself When Details Are Unknown

Review your account statements with Cosef for any unexpected activity. Contact the company and ask whether your records were included in the claimed incident. If you reuse the same password across multiple services, change it on those other accounts as a low-cost precaution. Place a fraud alert with the major credit bureaus so any new applications in your name trigger extra verification. Monitor your credit reports for accounts or addresses you do not recognise.

GalaxyWarden provides continuous monitoring across 13.1B+ breach records and 100+ platforms, with identity-chain mapping and remediation handled by specialists.

What the free scan actually returns

Sample resultyou@email.comIllustrative — not a real person

Found on people-search siteswe remove these

These listings are live, public, and legal to remove — and removing them is what we do.

value redacted in this sampleage, relatives, address historySpokeo
value redacted in this samplephone, household, property recordsBeenVerified
value redacted in this sample580 companies checked

Found in breach recordsverifiedreported — unverified

Each record is labeled: confirmed breach data, or an attacker’s claim no one has verified.

verifiedvalue redacted in this samplepassword + phone · 2024telecom breach
unverifiedvalue redacted in this sampleclaimed in ransomware listing · 2026leak-site claim

Leaked data cannot be deleted from the internet — anyone claiming otherwise is lying. Broker listings can be removed. We do the second, and show you exactly what to fix from the first.

Check your exposure
Cosef is one listing. Your email is probably in others.
We can’t confirm any single incident against the sources we search, so we won’t pretend to. What we can show you is your own exposure — your email against 13.1B+ leaked records and the sites that publish your address. About 15 seconds. No account, no card.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

Report details & sourcing

Severity High the filing does not enumerate what was exposed
Disclosed September 23, 2026
Last reviewed September 23, 2026
Affected Unconfirmed
Unverified claim — what this report is
This page documents a public listing on a ransomware/extortion group’s leak site, tracked via public threat-intelligence sources. A listing is the attacker’s claim. GalaxyWarden aggregates and reports such claims; we have not independently verified that a breach occurred, what data (if any) was taken, or the accuracy of anything the group asserts, and the named organisation has not necessarily confirmed the incident. Sections above describe what the listing shows and the group’s documented history — not verified findings about the named organisation. If you represent this organisation and believe anything here is inaccurate, tell us and we’ll review it promptly.
Editorial & sourcing policy
GalaxyWarden is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data. Breach information is compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms, and is reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — see our content & takedown policy or write to support@galaxywarden.com.
Share this Post on X Reddit Email