Skip to content
Back to Blog
high severity August 25, 2026 · 3 min read Unverified claim — what this is

A-Plus Software Limited Listed by ShadowByt3$ Ransomware Group

If you are a customer of A-Plus Software Limited, here’s what is being claimed, and what it would mean for you.

We Breached A-plus through a sql injection vulnerability and downloaded everything in there backend. We gained access to there system on 08/18/2026 The following data was stolen: 1. Website User Data (`usr.csv`) - This file contains the administrative backend infrastructure for the website, exposing: - 10 internal accounts, including the usernames `admin`, `debuger`, `camby`, `asuka`, `jimmy`, `ricole`, and `green`. - Password hashes (SHA-1 format) revealing that almost all administrative users shared the exact same password. - Internal access metadata 2. Marketing and Public Web Content

— from ShadowByt3$’s own leak-site posting. This is the group’s claim, quoted verbatim; it is not GalaxyWarden’s reporting and has not been independently verified.
A-Plus Software Limited Listed by ShadowByt3$ Ransomware Group

The group known as ShadowByt3$ has listed A-Plus Software Limited on its leak site, claiming it accessed the company’s systems through a SQL injection vulnerability on 18 August 2026. The company has not publicly confirmed the claim as of writing. The listing does not state how many people, if any, were affected, nor does it enumerate specific categories of customer information.

Watch A-Plus Software Limited

Get alerted the next time A-Plus Software Limited files a breach with any US regulator — the filing, dated and sourced. A free single-company slice of Signals; no account needed.

We’ll email you only about A-Plus Software Limited’s future breach filings and how to watch a whole vendor list — not general marketing. Unsubscribe any time.

Watching your whole vendor list (50 to 500 companies, by tier) is GalaxyWarden Signals — $499/mo or $4,990/yr (indicative estimate).

Shared Administrative Passwords Remain a Risk If the Claim Is Accurate

If the attackers obtained what they describe, the most immediate practical detail is that ten internal accounts used extremely weak practices. Almost all of them apparently relied on the same password, protected only by SHA-1 hashing. SHA-1 has been considered cryptographically broken for password storage for years. A fast hash like this means that once an attacker has the hash, guessing the original password is often trivial.

For you as a customer with an account on their systems, this matters only if you reuse the same password elsewhere. The brief record does not say customer passwords were taken. It focuses on administrative backend accounts. That distinction is important. Your own password is not reported as exposed here. However, if you chose the same password for your A-Plus account that the administrators apparently used internally, then that password should be treated as compromised and changed immediately on every service where you used it.

What a Leak-Site Listing Actually Establishes

Ransomware and extortion groups frequently post companies on leak sites with little or no independent validation. The purpose is often to pressure the target into paying rather than to publish genuine proof. Many listings turn out to be recycled from older incidents, exaggerated, or simply false. A single claim on a leak site, even one that includes sample files, does not constitute confirmation that a breach occurred or that any particular data left the company’s control.

Real confirmation would require an admission by A-Plus Software, a regulatory filing that clearly links this event to customer impact, or forensic evidence made public by a credible third party. Until one of those appears, this remains an unverified accusation. The absence of confirmation does not prove the claim is false, but it does mean you should treat it as uncertain rather than settled fact.

The Pattern of Opportunistic Ransomware Claims

ShadowByt3$ is following a now-common industry pattern: list organisations quickly, release limited samples, and hope the publicity creates pressure. Groups have learned that even weak evidence can generate news coverage and reputational damage. This inflates breach catalogues with claims that later prove overstated or unconnected to the victim’s actual security events.

For you, the usable takeaway is caution about password reuse. When administrative credentials are this poorly protected in any organisation you deal with, the safest assumption is that any password you share across sites could eventually surface. Changing important passwords to unique, strong values remains one of the few controls fully under your influence.

Passwords You Can Still Protect

Because no permanent identifiers such as Social Security numbers or dates of birth are listed in this filing, the long-term identity risks that appear in many other incidents do not apply here. What you can still control is future exposure.

Start by assuming that any password you have used on the A-Plus Software site in the last several years should be changed everywhere else it appears. Use a password manager to generate and store unique, long passwords. Enable multi-factor authentication on every service that offers it, especially accounts tied to your email or financial information. These steps do not erase what may already have happened, but they sharply limit what an attacker can do next.

Monitor your accounts for unusual activity in the coming weeks. While the record gives no evidence that customer financial data was taken, vigilance remains reasonable when an administrative compromise is alleged.

GalaxyWarden provides continuous monitoring across 13.1B+ breach records and 100+ platforms, with identity-chain mapping and remediation support by specialists.

What the free scan actually returns

Sample resultyou@email.comIllustrative — not a real person

Found on people-search siteswe remove these

These listings are live, public, and legal to remove — and removing them is what we do.

value redacted in this sampleage, relatives, address historySpokeo
value redacted in this samplephone, household, property recordsBeenVerified
value redacted in this sample582 companies checked

Found in breach recordsverifiedreported — unverified

Each record is labeled: confirmed breach data, or an attacker’s claim no one has verified.

verifiedvalue redacted in this samplepassword + phone · 2024telecom breach
unverifiedvalue redacted in this sampleclaimed in ransomware listing · 2026leak-site claim

Leaked data cannot be deleted from the internet — anyone claiming otherwise is lying. Broker listings can be removed. We do the second, and show you exactly what to fix from the first.

Check your exposure
A-Plus Software Limited is one listing. Your email is probably in others.
We can’t confirm any single incident against the sources we search, so we won’t pretend to. What we can show you is your own exposure — your email against 13.1B+ leaked records and the sites that publish your address. About 15 seconds. No account, no card.

By running your scan you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy, and to GalaxyWarden emailing you the results of this scan.

Report details & sourcing

Severity High the filing does not enumerate what was exposed
Disclosed August 25, 2026
Last reviewed August 25, 2026
Affected Unconfirmed
Unverified claim — what this report is
This page documents a public listing on a ransomware/extortion group’s leak site, tracked via public threat-intelligence sources. A listing is the attacker’s claim. GalaxyWarden aggregates and reports such claims; we have not independently verified that a breach occurred, what data (if any) was taken, or the accuracy of anything the group asserts, and the named organisation has not necessarily confirmed the incident. Sections above describe what the listing shows and the group’s documented history — not verified findings about the named organisation. If you represent this organisation and believe anything here is inaccurate, tell us and we’ll review it promptly.
Editorial & sourcing policy
GalaxyWarden is a breach-monitoring service and news aggregator. We do not exfiltrate, host, purchase, or redistribute stolen data. Breach information is compiled from publicly accessible sources and threat-intelligence platforms, and is reported as claims attributed to their source. We promptly correct or remove material shown to be inaccurate — see our content & takedown policy or write to support@galaxywarden.com.
Share this Post on X Reddit Email